Talk:HMS Collingwood (1882)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 10:29, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

I'll be back in an hour. JAG UAR   10:29, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Initial comments

 * "Collingwood was not significantly damaged during an accidental collision" - you could mention that she badly damaged the Curacoa
 * Yeah, but remember that the lede's a summary and the important thing is not what she did to the other ship, but what damaged was done to her.
 * "by the four French Terrible-class" - link Terrible-class ship of the line? If it's correct?
 * Nope, I need to write the stubs for these ships once this thing is done.
 * "Barnaby was severely criticized" - criticised
 * " Reed believed that this weakness meant that the ship could be sunk from the consequent uninhibited flooding if her unarmored ends" - unarmoured
 * " the ship's draught increased by another 6 inches" - convert to metric
 * Done in the armament section
 * "The main ammunition hoists protected by armoured tubes with walls 10–12 inches thick" - The main ammunition hoists were protected by armoured tubes with walls 10–12 inches thick
 * "Collingwood accidentally collided with the cruiser Curacoa" - I'm probably overthinking this, but why is the 'HMS' prefix missing?
 * No dead links (in other words, the only link isn't dead!)
 * No dab links

Those were all of the minor issues I could find. Is it just me or did every Royal Navy ship collide with another back in those days LOL. JAG UAR   13:09, 12 April 2016 (UTC) Many thanks for tackling these so promptly. As always, I'm happy to help you win the GA reviewing portion of this contest.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 21:05, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for taking care of them. I'm always keeping an eye out for any of the Welsh GANs up at the moment! This meets the criteria now.  JAG  UAR   21:09, 12 April 2016 (UTC)