Talk:HMS Concorde (1783)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: — Ed! (talk) 22:44, 20 October 2010 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria) (see here for this contributor's history of GA reviews)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written:
 * Hold
 * 1) The lead needs to be reworked. Right now it consists of a small graph summarizing the article followed by a longer one summarizing the same thing. It should be 2 or 3 graphs and summarize the entire thing only once.
 * 2) French Career: The use of time is inconsistent (6 o'clock, 8pm, 1.15pm) and needs to be standardized. I would recommend using four-digit time which is easier to read. Adding the local time zone (or UTC time) would also be helpful.
 * 3) "after an hour and three quarters of fighting, forced her to surrender" — that sounds odd. Can you change it to "X minutes" instead?
 * 4) The 'Later years' section is very short. I would suggest either expanding it or merging it with another section.
 * 5) It is factually accurate and verifiable:
 * Pass no problems there.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage:
 * Pass no problems there.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy:
 * Pass no problems there.
 * 1) It is stable:
 * Pass no problems there.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate:
 * On Hold For the images, would it be possible to point out exactly which of the ships is supposed to be Concorde?
 * To answer that, while I have a decent idea of which ship might be which, I'm not positive, so I'm probably not the right person to be adding that in. Wizardman  Operation Big Bear 18:30, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * On Hold while a few things are sorted out. — Ed! (talk) 23:14, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

Issues fixed. I can ask the MILHIST project if they're able to figure out how to distinguish the ships in the pictures. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 18:38, 23 October 2010 (UTC)