Talk:HMS Crusader (H60)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Sp33dyphil (talk · contribs) 06:25, 14 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Where's the caption for the first pic?
 * Added.
 * "the ship spent"
 * Good catch.
 * Please add to dates
 * Not required by MOS, otherwise somebody at FAC would have complained about their lac,.
 * What's the "1929 Programme"?
 * Clarified.
 * "sailed to Greenock, Scotland, and" note the comma
 * Agreed.
 * "while 69 survivors were rescued by nearby vessels." passive voice.
 * Fixed.
 * Checklinks reviews 3 damaged links.
 * The links are good, you just need to select which convoy you want to look at.
 * Add alt text to images (strongly recommended).


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:31, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Is there anything left to do here?--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 04:50, 26 October 2011 (UTC)