Talk:HMS Diana (H49)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Harrison49 (talk) 20:06, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 02:18, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * fixed - Shem (talk) 11:39, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * Done.
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:

Fair use for File:HMS Diana Crest.jpg
It seems to me that the fair use rationale for File:HMS Diana Crest.jpg is entirely sufficient, and suitably detailed; crests and badges are pretty standard fare for this type of fair use, hence the use of. Shem (talk) 12:06, 20 April 2011 (UTC)