Talk:HMS Empire Battleaxe

Requested move
move Anthony Appleyard (talk) 10:18, 21 May 2009 (UTC) HMS Donovan (F161) → HMS Empire Battleaxe — The majority of this ships' Naval service was under the name HMS Empire Battleaxe, not HMS Donovan — Mjroots (talk) 16:06, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

Survey

 * Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with  or  , then sign your comment with  . Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.


 * Support per nom. Mjroots (talk) 16:06, 13 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Support likewise per nom. YeshuaDavid (talk) 16:20, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Discussion

 * Any additional comments:

Wouldn't just "Empire Battleaxe" be more appropriate, since it would cover her career both with the Navy and in much of her commercial service? Gatoclass (talk) 03:09, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Using just Empire Battleaxe is against the convention for naming ship articles. Doing so would imply that she was a sailing ship, like Empire Sandy. Her most notable service was as HMS Empire Battleaxe, which is why I've requested the move to that title. Mjroots (talk) 05:41, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I think SS Empire Battleaxe would be best because it was the name under which she was known for 20 of her 26 years, including about half (one of the two paragraphs) of the notable wartime service (the other notable half under HMS Empire Battleaxe) — Bellhalla (talk) 12:56, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Hmm, but from 1947 to 1966 she seems to have spent the entire time laid up. Hardly active commercial service, is it? Mjroots (talk) 17:07, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Good point. But as long as it's under some form of Empire Battleaxe I have no problem with whatever name selected. — Bellhalla (talk) 14:49, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on HMS Empire Battleaxe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090519070241/http://www.anzac.dpc.wa.gov.au/documents/stories/nions_ah_20050316.pdf to http://www.anzac.dpc.wa.gov.au/documents/stories/nions_ah_20050316.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 10:07, 27 October 2017 (UTC)