Talk:HMS Fearless (H67)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk · contribs) 14:04, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Will get to this one shortly. Parsecboy (talk) 14:04, 26 October 2015 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * No dupe links
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * You might want to add a photo of a SM.79 to the last section - readers might be interested in the type of aircraft that sank the ship. This one might be a good choice, given that it's carrying a torpedo in the photo.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Nothing to hold up promotion, great work. Parsecboy (talk) 18:28, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * You might want to add a photo of a SM.79 to the last section - readers might be interested in the type of aircraft that sank the ship. This one might be a good choice, given that it's carrying a torpedo in the photo.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Nothing to hold up promotion, great work. Parsecboy (talk) 18:28, 29 October 2015 (UTC)