Talk:HMS Furious (47)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jim Sweeney (talk) 10:28, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Comments

 * 1) There are two disamb links that need looking at Lifeboat and Pechenga
 * Done.
 * 1) Alt text could be added to the images
 * 2) What makes http://www.gwpda.org/naval/opzz.htm a reliable site ?
 * Deleted
 * 1) The are two books by Burt in the bibliography but some of the citations are not clear about which book is being used no's 15,16,19 and 20 for example only list Burt and the page number.
 * Fixed
 * 1) Sturtivant is not listed in the bibliography
 * Added.

I've put the article on hold for seven days to allow folks to address the issues I've brought up. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, or here with any concerns, and let me know one of those places when the issues have been addressed. If I may suggest that you strike out, check mark, or otherwise mark the items I've detailed, that will make it possible for me to see what's been addressed, and you can keep track of what's been done and what still needs to be worked on.--Jim Sweeney (talk) 11:26, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the reviews.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:03, 21 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Passed --Jim Sweeney (talk) 21:58, 21 September 2010 (UTC)