Talk:HMS Gallant (H59)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Thurgate (talk) 00:43, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * prose:  (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * 2) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Comments
1. complement was 137 officers and men in peacetime. Might be worth noting the additional men in wartime. 2. Exclusive of government-furnished equipment like the armament. Do you mean Excluding? 3. her sister Griffin. Suggest - her sister-ship Griffin I've put the article on hold for seven days to allow you to address the issues I've brought up. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, or here with any concerns. Thurgate (talk) 00:43, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Done.
 * Done.
 * Nope, already referred to her as sister ship earlier. Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:18, 22 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Nice Work, Passed. Thurgate (talk) 14:40, 22 February 2011 (UTC)