Talk:HMS Good Hope (1901)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will (talk · contribs) 04:21, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

: After a few minor grammatical tweaks on my part, I feel that the article satisfies the MOS policies for grammar and prose, layout and structure. As you’ll see, I’ve added some shortening to my sig! (talk) 00:36, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)

: The article makes use of a good dose of reputable published sources, and does not appear to include any original research. As you’ll see, I’ve added some shortening to my sig! (talk) 00:35, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)
 * (c)

: The article covers all important aspects of its subject for which reliable information is accessible. No information covered appears irrelevant. As you’ll see, I’ve added some shortening to my sig! (talk) 00:34, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)

. The article is free of any bias towards or against its subject. As you’ll see, I’ve added some shortening to my sig! (talk) 00:32, 12 March 2014 (UTC) . The immediate revision list shows that no edit warring has taken place in the last three years, so we're clear on this one. As you’ll see, I’ve added some shortening to my sig! (talk) 17:22, 11 March 2014 (UTC) : All three images used in the article serve a valid purpose and are properly licensed. As you’ll see, I’ve added some shortening to my sig! (talk) 17:21, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)

After reading through the article and making minor adjustments where it seemed needed, I feel this article is good to go. Congratulations! As you’ll see, I’ve added some shortening to my sig! (talk) 00:37, 12 March 2014 (UTC)