Talk:HMS Hampshire (1903)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk · contribs) 17:05, 19 March 2014 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * " commander-in-chief of the China Station, to destroy the German radio station at Yap together with" - it seems like that should have been split after "the China Station" and that something like "She was ordered..." should be inserted there.
 * I am prone to string a few too many facts into one sentence. Fixed.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 22:20, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Images both check out.
 * 1) Overall:
 * 'Not much here to pick on, just that one sentence that reads funny to me. Parsecboy (talk) 17:05, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Images both check out.
 * 1) Overall:
 * 'Not much here to pick on, just that one sentence that reads funny to me. Parsecboy (talk) 17:05, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the review.
 * Looks good, passing now. Parsecboy (talk) 12:27, 24 March 2014 (UTC)