Talk:HMS Harvester (H19)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jim Sweeney (talk · contribs) 08:33, 2 December 2011 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Comments

 * The ISBN for Friedman, Norman (2009) needs attention its giving the error message he given ISBN does not appear to be valid; check for errors copying from the original source. on the checker
 * Fixed.
 * Citation 6 and 7 to Wiser but the book appears to be named Winser presumably ones a typo
 * Fixed.
 * Is there a cite for the Pennant number H19 is not in the text, but mentioned in the inf box and of course the article title
 * Done.


 * Almost a shame to put on hold, just the three small points (and the last ones really nit picking)Jim Sweeney (talk) 21:31, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 21:51, 2 December 2011 (UTC)