Talk:HMS Hasty (H24)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: SMasters (talk) 08:51, 24 March 2011 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * There were numerous punctuation issues but I have fixed them. Otherwise, the article is well written and complies to MOS requirements.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Article is properly referenced with reliable sources and has no original research.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Article covers all major aslects and is focused.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * Article complies to WP:NPOV.
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * Article is stable.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Images are correctly tagged.
 * 1) Overall: Aside from some minor punctuation issues (if you can't read a whole sentence without running out of breath, you need a comma somewhere!), which I have fixed, the article complies to all the requirements for a GA, and I am happy to pass it. – SMasters (talk) 09:13, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Pass/Fail: