Talk:HMS Hercules (1910)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Peacemaker67 (talk · contribs) 06:27, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

This article is in pretty good shape. That's me done. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:16, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
 * The displacement in the text and infobox doesn't match.
 * probably worth specifying that the secondary guns were in single mounts
 * After introducing BS as an abbreviation, suggest referring to 1st BS.
 * suggest linking mobilisation
 * Excellent idea!
 * link Home Fleet at first mention
 * Linked in the lede
 * link dreadnought at 16 dreadnoughts
 * Isn't this covered in the link for dreadnought battleships in the lede? Or is this just different enough?
 * the sentence beginning During this foray appears to be out of sequence
 * Moved earlier in the para, but I kinda think that it breaks the flow up a bit, what do you think?
 * I think it flows ok.
 * Agincourt should probably be linked
 * Good catch.
 * she was sold
 * images are all appropriately licensed and captioned.
 * I appreciate you looking this over. Let me know what you think of my changes.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:29, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
 * No prob. This article is well-written, verifiable using reliable sources, covers the subject well, is neutral and stable, and is illustrated by appropriately license images with appropriate captions. Passing. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:50, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

HE shell use at Jutland ?
"One of her high-explosive (HE) shells penetrated through the upper superstructure and caused minor splinter damage. The second HE shell burst on hitting the upper hull armour,.." ? She would have been firing armour-piercing, not HE at naval targets ? Rcbutcher (talk) 06:21, 9 March 2017 (UTC)