Talk:HMS Hereward (H93)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk · contribs) 13:50, 26 October 2011 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * Is "refuelled" Brit-English? (as opposed to "refueled")
 * You know, I don't know? My unconscious habit is to always double the terminal "1" when putting the word in past tense. Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:44, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
 * I only noticed it because I checked for typos in the editing window - Firefox underlined it and suggested it should be one "l". Parsecboy (talk) 18:59, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
 * There are a few dabs that should be hidden (Valiant and Orion, maybe the title for John Buchan, forex)
 * Done.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Just a couple of little things to check. Parsecboy (talk) 13:50, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Just a couple of little things to check. Parsecboy (talk) 13:50, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Just a couple of little things to check. Parsecboy (talk) 13:50, 26 October 2011 (UTC)