Talk:HMS Hindustan (1903)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Ed! (talk · contribs) 17:44, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

Will look at this one. —Ed!(talk) 17:44, 12 January 2019 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria) (see here for this contributor's history of GA reviews)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written:
 * Pass Dab links, dup links and external links tools all show no problems. Copyvio tool returns green.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable:
 * Pass Offline sources accepted in good faith, checks of Google Books return results generally in line with article content.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage:
 * Not yet
 * Any idea of unit cost for ships of the class? Also when the budget for construction was authorized?
 * See my comment on the Commonwealth review on unit cost, and the King Edward VIIs were ordered under the 1901, 1902, and 1903 estimates, but Burt doesn't give a specific breakdown that I see.
 * "Grand Fleet commander, Admiral John Jellicoe, ordered Bradford to take the 3rd Battle Squadron" -- No first reference to Bradford.
 * Fixed
 * "during which a German U-boat attacked the battleships but failed to score a hit.[13]" -- any idea which one? Can be a footnote if not clear.
 * No, unfortunately
 * "and collided with and badly damaged the destroyer HMS Wrestler in May 1918." -- Should note if no damage to this ship, and any damage to Wrestler.
 * Clarified that Hindustan was not damaged
 * Should be a mention of if there were any battle honours, or none if applicable.
 * Nothing I've seen in Burt or elsewhere.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy:
 * Pass No problems there.
 * 1) It is stable:
 * Pass No problems there.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate:
 * Pass Four images cited to PD or CC where appropriate.
 * 1) Other:
 * On Hold Pending a few fixes. —Ed!(talk) 17:59, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks again, Ed. Parsecboy (talk) 14:13, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

Pass All of this works. As is the article meets the GA criteria to me. Well done! —Ed!(talk) 00:30, 15 January 2019 (UTC)