Talk:HMS Hotspur (H01)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Thurgate (talk) 17:09, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * prose:  (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * 2) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Comments
1. but in increased to 146 in wartime. Suggest - but this was increased to 146 in wartime. 2. edicts. Suggest a link for this 3. British and Australian troops from the beaches. Is that the Greek beaches? 4. in June after working up. Suggest - in June after her refit 5. ship's Hedgehog? What's the ships headhog?
 * Indeed.
 * Changed to policies.
 * Yes, just like I said earlier in the sentence
 * Linked it instead.
 * See the previous paragraph.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 22:31, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

I've put the article on hold for seven days to allow you to address the issues I've brought up. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, or here with any concerns. Thurgate (talk) 17:09, 1 March 2011 (UTC)]

Nice work Strum. Passed. Thurgate (talk) 00:22, 2 March 2011 (UTC)