Talk:HMS Maenad (1915)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Thehistorianisaac (talk · contribs) 09:42, 8 December 2022 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

New reviewer needed
The original review was reverted; a new reviewer is needed to start from scratch and do a complete review according to the GA criteria. Thank you very much. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:22, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
 * - I'll take a look at this. Hog Farm Talk 15:40, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I look forward to your insights. simongraham (talk)


 * "However, the German's recorded no loss" - I'm certainly no master of punctuation and am not quite confident to just remove it myself, but I don't think the apostrophe is warranted
 * Good spot. I have amended this to remove the ambiguity.
 * The Jutland artwork - if possible, I think it would be helpful to indicate in the caption if Maenad is the vessel partially seen in the foreground or the shadowy vessels in the background
 * It seems to be the one on the foreground. Amended.
 * Campbell isn't used, remove or move to further reading
 * I have reread the relevant parts in Campbell and added some hopefully interesting facts.

I'll try to do some spotchecks later. Hog Farm Talk 16:33, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you. In the interim, I believe that I have made the edits as suggested. simongraham (talk) 12:37, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
 * No issues from a spot-check perspective and the additions from Campbell look fine. Passing. Hog Farm Talk 03:00, 21 December 2022 (UTC)