Talk:HMS Minotaur (1906)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk · contribs) 19:27, 10 December 2012 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * The prose says 779 officers and men, but the infobox says 802 - which is the correct number?
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Everything else looks to be in order, just the discrepancy between the crew size numbers. Good work as usual. Parsecboy (talk) 19:27, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Everything else looks to be in order, just the discrepancy between the crew size numbers. Good work as usual. Parsecboy (talk) 19:27, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Everything else looks to be in order, just the discrepancy between the crew size numbers. Good work as usual. Parsecboy (talk) 19:27, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the review. Fixed the crew size; copy-paste error from Defense.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:22, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I figured it was something like that. Passing now. Parsecboy (talk) 23:08, 11 December 2012 (UTC)