Talk:HMS Monmouth (1901)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will (talk · contribs) 03:35, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

: A few minor grammatical fixes, and the article checks out in terms of prose, structure and style. As you’ll see, I’ve added some shortening to my sig! (talk) 21:40, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)

: The article is well-cited and gives no indication that any original research has been incorporated. It also hosts a comfortably-sized bibliography of reputable published sources. As you’ll see, I’ve added some shortening to my sig! (talk) 07:35, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)
 * (c)

: The article covers all information of a relevant nature for encyclopedic inclusion. Nothing is overly buttered or otherwise padded unnecessarily. As you’ll see, I’ve added some shortening to my sig! (talk) 07:34, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)

. The article takes a consistently fair tone with regards to its subject. As you’ll see, I’ve added some shortening to my sig! (talk) 07:31, 15 March 2014 (UTC) . An immediate look at the revision history shows that the article has been free of edit warring for at least about six years. As you’ll see, I’ve added some shortening to my sig! (talk) 03:39, 12 March 2014 (UTC) : The sole image used in the article serves a relevant illustrative purpose, namely in the infobox, and is validly licensed. As you’ll see, I’ve added some shortening to my sig! (talk) 03:38, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)

Comments

 * In the last two paragraphs of the section "Battle of Coronel", there are a number of references to a "he", the identity of whom did not strike me as clear. Specifically, the excerpts: "He broke contact with the German squadron at 20:05 and discovered Monmouth...", "The German cruiser closed to within 600 yards (550 m) and illuminated her flag with his spotlight...", and "The German ship then fired a torpedo which missed and turned off his searchlight". Are German vessels sometimes referred to as males instead of females, or are these instances meant to refer to any of the officers involved in the battle? As you’ll see, I’ve added some shortening to my sig! (talk) 07:42, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Fixed. Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:23, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Good to go, in that case. Congratulations! :) As you’ll see, I’ve added some shortening to my sig! (talk) 21:41, 16 March 2014 (UTC)