Talk:HMS Munster/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jack4576 (talk · contribs) 13:10, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

(Criteria marked are unassessed)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):
 * The prose, spelling, and grammar are all up to a high standard.
 * b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * The lead section provides a good summary of the topic, the layout is clear and organized, the word choice is appropriate and not fiction-based, and no lists are present that would disrupt the flow of the article.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a. (reference section):
 * The article is well-referenced throughout.
 * b. (citations to reliable sources):
 * The citations link to reliable sources, such as well-respected books and official records.
 * c. (OR):
 * There doesn't seem to be any original research; all information is supported by citations.
 * d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * There is no evidence of copyright violation or plagiarism.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a. (major aspects):
 * The article covers all major aspects of the subject, including its construction, deployments, and eventual decommission.
 * b. (focused):
 * The article remains focused on the subject throughout.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * The article appears to be written from a neutral point of view, without favoring any particular perspective.
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * There is no evidence of any edit wars or major disputes over the content.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
 * Images are used appropriately
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * as above
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * There is no evidence of any edit wars or major disputes over the content.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
 * Images are used appropriately
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * as above
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * Pass/fail: