Talk:HMS Pelorus (J291)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Peacemaker67 (talk · contribs) 02:04, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

This article is in good shape, it is stable, images are appropriately licensed, prose is good, sources are all there and apparently reliable, structure makes sense and there are no obvious issues with neutrality or plagiarisation. There are just a few minor differences between the values in the body and the values in the infobox, which appear to be caused by difference in conversion template values. For example, the standard displacement conversion in the body says 1,050, but the infobox says 1,047. There are similar discrepancies with the conversions of overall length, beam and draught. Also, there is 40-millimeter but also metres, so they should just be consistent, British English is probably preferred for an ex-Brit warship. That's about all I could fault against the GA criteria. Great job as always on an interesting little warship. I'm just placing it on hold for those minor points to be addressed. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:21, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Yeah, just rounding errors. All fixed. Thanks for getting to this so quickly.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 05:07, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
 * ✅ No prob. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:21, 6 November 2016 (UTC)