Talk:HMS Prince (1854)

Contradiction
This article contradicts itself:

"and carried 150 persons, all of whom were lost,"

"she broke up completely within ten minutes and only six of her 150 crew were saved"

Which is true?


 * Good point. I have assumed the contemporary Times report, not the modern day BBC article and changed accordingly. - I had already made this correction but lost it in an  edit conflict,  Springnuts (talk) 16:48, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on HMS Prince (1854). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100328234607/http://timesonline.typepad.com/timesarchive/2010/03/the-loss-and-finding-of-crimean-troop-ship-hms-prince.html to http://timesonline.typepad.com/timesarchive/2010/03/the-loss-and-finding-of-crimean-troop-ship-hms-prince.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 11:22, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Battle of Bomarsund
Something to think about and tie into this article? He George Biddlecombe conducted the allied fleets to Cronstadt, and taking charge in Led Sund of the Prince steamer, with upwards of 2,000 French troops on board, he carried that ship to Bomarsund, and was afterwards present at the fall of that fortress. See https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Biddlecombe,_George_(DNB00) Broichmore (talk) 15:16, 31 July 2019 (UTC)