Talk:HMS Resistance (1861)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Zawed (talk · contribs) 10:01, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

Criteria
Only issue noted is with duplicate links. Otherwise, all good. Zawed (talk) 10:01, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
 * It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * A few duplicate links: muzzle velocity, bulkhead, wrought iron
 * It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * No citation errors noted.
 * It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
 * It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
 * a (tagged and captioned): b (Is illustrated with appropriate images):  c (non-free images have fair use rationales):  d public domain pictures appropriately demonstrate why they are public domain:
 * Appropriate tags used for images.
 * Overall:
 * a Pass/Fail:
 * All fixed. Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 13:54, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Passed as GA. Zawed (talk) 10:59, 4 May 2013 (UTC)