Talk:HMS Royal Sovereign (05)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Thurgate (talk · contribs) 11:52, 2 May 2012 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * prose:  (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * 2) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Comments
1. with its maximum thickness between 'A' and 'Y' barbettes - did you forget to put in how thick the amour was?

2. tasked with meeting Allied convoys in the Arctic Ocean and escort them into Kola - Suggest escorting them into Kola

I've put the article on hold for seven days to allow you to address the issues I've brought up. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, or here with any concerns. Thurgate (talk) 12:36, 2 May 2012 (UTC)


 * 1. No, it's saying that the diagonal armored bulkheads started where the maximum thickness of the belt stopped, and ran to the turrets on either end of the ship.
 * 2. Sounds good to me, changed per your suggestion. Parsecboy (talk) 23:37, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

I see no other issues with the article. Passed, nice job Parsec. Thurgate (talk) 00:52, 3 May 2012 (UTC)