Talk:HMS Thunderer (1872)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 11:16, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

I'll do this shortly. JAG UAR   11:16, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Initial comments

 * "and gained a reputation as a unlucky ship for several years afterward" - an unlucky ship
 * "The ship was assigned to the Portsmouth Reserve in January 1888 before beginning a major modernization" - modernisation
 * "The Devastation-class ships had a complete wrought iron waterline armour belt that was 12 inches thick" - convert to mertic
 * Done in the armament section.
 * No dead links
 * " of wrought iron armour at the muzzle" - muzzle is a dab link
 * "The muzzle-loading gun had been double-loaded following a misfire" - misfire is a dab link
 * True, but the last entry is the actual definition that I'm referring to.

Too bad this isn't HMS Thunder Child!! On hold. JAG UAR   14:35, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Isn't it though! Thanks for reviewing this.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:52, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Sadly it's the closest thing we can get to Thunder Child. I actually listened to it whilst reviewing this! Anyway, with all of the issues out of the way, this can be promoted  JAG  UAR   21:08, 21 April 2016 (UTC)