Talk:HMS Triton (1796)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 01:16, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

I'll get to this shortly--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:16, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
 * No DABs, external links OK
 * File:Sir John Gore.jpeg needs a British license
 * All other images properly licensed
 * Hyphen for fifth rate
 * Policy is not to cite data in the infobox if it's covered in the main body.
 * Drop trailing zeros in conversions
 * What you did is fine, but you can control your trailing digits by adding, forex |0, to the template to round to the nearest whole number, or |1 to the nearest tenth, etc.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 02:03, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Fix the link to weatherly ship so that it actually links to the term
 * with Triton involving herself more in close blockade work than in earlier years Rephrase, she had about a year's service by this point!
 * More later.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 21:26, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Tell the reader what type of ship each British ship is on first mention. Generalities suffice as the reader can look them up to see each one's rating if curious.
 * Suggest add a period at the end of the title in the bibliography to help separate it from the publisher's location.
 * Nicely done.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:06, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi, thanks very much for doing this! I believe I have made all the corrections you listed here, but would appreciate it if you could check the File:Sir John Gore.jpeg, I am still not too sure I've done that correctly. Thanks again, Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 00:26, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
 * One small correction to the image licensing that you added, but it should be good to go now. You did a nice job here; I hope you do more of these type of articles. Just remember to avoid the sorts of things that needed to be corrected here.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 02:03, 30 April 2021 (UTC)