Talk:HMS Triumph (1903)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jackyd101 (talk · contribs) 00:09, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

Hi there, I am happy to tell you that this article has passed GA without the need for any further improvement. Listed below is information on how the article fared against the good article criteria, with suggestions for future development. These are not required to achieve GA standard, but they might help in future A-class or FAC review process.
 * It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Is a link to South American dreadnought race relevant for the design paragraph (this point is also relevant to the HMS Swiftsure (1903) article I reviewed a few days ago).
 * Captain during the First World War was Maurice Swynfen Fitzmaurice - this should be mentioned in the article.
 * It would be beneficial to incorporate some information on the wreck of Triumph. This website might not qualify as an RS, but it does demonstrate that there is interest in the wreck as a dive site and that there has been a National Geographic documentary made on the shipwreck.


 * It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
 * It is stable.
 * It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
 * a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA):  c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
 * Overall:
 * a Pass/Fail:
 * a Pass/Fail:

Thankyou and congratulations, an excellent addition to Wikipedia:Good Articles. All the best.--Jackyd101 (talk) 00:09, 7 April 2012 (UTC)