Talk:HMS Zubian/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will (talk · contribs) 02:14, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

: The article looks to comply with MOS guidelines on prose and grammar, structure and layout. Spring in Wikipedia is lovely! Just avoid the articles on flowers... (talk) 04:23, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)

: The article uses a very many reliable third-party sources, and makes frequent citations to them. Nothing resembles original research. Spring in Wikipedia is lovely! Just avoid the articles on flowers... (talk) 04:22, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)
 * (c)

: The article seems to cover all the aspects of the subject for which reliable encyclopedic information is available. Nothing trivial incorporated. Spring in Wikipedia is lovely! Just avoid the articles on flowers... (talk) 04:20, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)

. No signs of bias towards/against the subject or any topic even briefly covered in the article. Spring in Wikipedia is lovely! Just avoid the articles on flowers... (talk) 04:19, 10 June 2014 (UTC) . The revision history shows no indication of any edit warring taking place on this article - certainly not in the past four years. Spring in Wikipedia is lovely! Just avoid the articles on flowers... (talk) 04:09, 10 June 2014 (UTC) : Both images used in the article serve a relevant illustrative purpose, and are properly licensed. Spring in Wikipedia is lovely! Just avoid the articles on flowers... (talk) 04:08, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)

After reviewing this article, I am confident that it satisfies the GA criteria. Congratulations! :) Spring in Wikipedia is lovely! Just avoid the articles on flowers... (talk) 04:25, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks much for reviewing the article, and so quickly! Parsecboy (talk) 14:53, 10 June 2014 (UTC)