Talk:HSC Speedrunner Jet

Branding
The facts about what happened after the couldn't sell the ships to Tallink differ within the SuperSeaCat articles. In one they operate under a different brand in the other they stay at the same company! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.40.10.178 (talk) 08:52, 7 September 2008 (UTC)


 * No, the SS3 article states that "Hence Sea Containers decided, despite their earlier decision, to continue operating SuperSeaCat Three and Four under the SuperSeaCat brand", while the SSC4 article says "Because of this the SuperSeaCats were branched off from Silja to form a separate company, SuperSeaCat". A brand is not the same thing as company. Prior to the Tallink takeover of Silja the SSCs were directly owned by SeaContainers and operated under the dual brand of SuperSeaCat Silja Line. After the takeover and separation of the SSC operations SeaContainers started a new company in Finland, named SuperSeaCat, to operate the ships, but the SuperSeaCat branding remained the same. It is perhaps true that the articles should be more properly worded to this effect, but there is currently no conflict between the articles for HSC SuperSeaCat Three and HSC SuperSeaCat Four regards to their branding and ownership after the separation from Silja. -- Kjet (talk · contribs) 18:38, 7 September 2008 (UTC)