Talk:HTC First/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: MrWooHoo (talk · contribs) 18:22, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

I'll start this review ASAP. Just before we begin, to sort out confusion, I will have a general review then an in depth prose and source review. In the general review, I'll use the "GA tools" box. Cheers! MrWooHoo (talk) 18:20, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Just a couple of tiny prose issues and I'll pass. MrWooHoo (talk) 19:17, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

General Review

 * Only thing GA tools is saying is to avoid using "th" as in January 30th, but I can't find any examples of that in the article. No problems then!

Prose Review
Note: If you have changed the sentence that needed to be corrected, press Enter and start off the line with, then use ✅ or ✅ If the change was only partially done use, and or ❌ if the change could not occur. (If you would explain why, I would be greatly appreciated :P) To see code, go to edit source and copy the code.


 * "First, only reportedly sold over 15,000 units of the device, while both ReadWrite and Time named it among the biggest failures in the technology industry for 2013.[1][2]"
 * You don't need to cite this in the lead, as per WP:WHENNOTCITE.
 * ✅ SST flyer 02:07, 20 May 2016 (UTC)


 * " the keyboard messagine HTC Status,"
 * What's a messagine? I'm assuming it's a typo?
 * ✅ SST flyer 02:10, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Source Review

 * No dead links, so sources are good. MrWooHoo (talk) 19:17, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

All done I think. SST flyer 02:11, 20 May 2016 (UTC)