Talk:HUB-Robeson Center

Third-party sources tag
It's not clear that any of the provided sources are truly independent of the subject. TourtheTen claims to be independent, but as a tour guide explicitly for the Big Ten colleges, I'm not sure it's necessarily independent and reliable enough for our purposes. "Architecture Magazine" sounds reliable, but when you look at the webpage, you'll see that the parent-page specifies that anyone can submit their projects to the gallery. Ironically, the unambiguously non-independent article at statecollege.com may nevertheless be the most reliable source currently cited, as I'm assuming that the NYT coverage (I couldn't access the article) is primarily about the news story of the shooting, not the actual HUB-Robeson center. signed,Rosguill talk 01:05, 10 February 2020 (UTC)-


 * What information do you find to be unverifiable and/or what parts of the article do you believe to not be neutral? I see no agenda being pushed by the article, much less one that furthers it by relying on a potentially non-independent sources. Since I see no reasonable doubt as to the authenticity of the claims made in the article, nor do any of the sources (or use of sources) act in a self-serving manner, then I see zero reason for the tag. Your last bit seems to be concerning notability, which is a whole different tag and one that if you wanted to post, I wouldn't have any objection to. Cheers. Sulfurboy (talk) 02:52, 10 February 2020 (UTC)