Talk:Haccombe

Better references needed
Of the 26 references cited in today's version of the article, 20 of them are over a century old, and 8 (totalling 18 individual refs out of the total of 36) are to sources written in the 17th century (Pole and Risdon), which cannot be considered to be reliable secondary sources. This article needs more recent reliable sources to confirm that what is said in these 100-plus-year-old texts is still considered by scholars to be correct today. —S MALL JIM   10:15, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

Excellent photographs and valuable heraldry
Excellent photographs and valuable heraldry, which are a pleasure to see, but the text! Sad lack of verified dates, a medieval delight in eccentric spelling, olde-worlde language, pointless duplication, and replication of old texts which need not be cited in full if at all. As well as use of up-to-date online sources, recommended above, in my view it needs bold pruning. Clifford Mill (talk) 15:01, 30 October 2017 (UTC)