Talk:Hackintosh/Archive 2

No one sued?
"As of November 2008, no person(s) using OSx86 on non-Apple hardware have been sued by Apple." What about Psystar? I've removed that section. -Mlaheji (talk) 18:56, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

Frijóle
After your little pointless war I wonder why you kept it up seeing as it is NOT a blog, it serves useful information AND you have still failed to notice that External Links contains a duplicate for the OSx86Project homepage. LOL. Fail.


 * See WP:EL for more information - the page is not to be a comprehensive list of external links. On top of that, the link that you advocate appears to be virtually content-free. Disguising the title the way you do makes it even more suspect. 205.205.56.11 (talk) 16:10, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Archived talk

 * Talk:OSx86/Archive1

84.142.245.165 11:27, 1 May 2007 (UTC) is it possibel to somehow protect links as they get spammed all the time?

I have an iPhone
Ok, Considering they say "Apple-labeled" and my iPhone came with a set of stickers, that I have in plain sight on two of my laptops. I am wondering does that make any apple based OS install on my laptops legit ? This are dell based PCs. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Haqtiq (talk • contribs) 06:35, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Nope, lol! Didn't you see the C|NET Vid?14:44, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Who says CNETs right? I wouldn't install it anyway, myself.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.17.247.123 (talk) 18:20, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

Snow Leopard
Hey guys,

Let's clean this up now that Snow Leopard is out. I'm a WikiNoob, but I added a bit on 10.6. It's all accurate as far as I know, and fairly straightforward.

Merger Proposal
I propose that the article Hackintosh be merged here. The article is just a stub that states the "hacks" already discussed here in greater detail. Considering it is a stub, it woulnd't overwhelm the content here. Wizoomer95 (talk) 22:53, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, there aren't enough different meanings of the word 'Hackintosh' to maintain a separate article about it.  Aaditya 7  14:16, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

This is stale so I am doing it per WP:BOLD. I don't think there is anything to merge, so I am just redirecting.--Cerejota (talk) 01:46, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

Deleted Sections
There is absolutely no reason why somebody needs to delete sections out of the wiki. I am referring to the Chimera and tonymacx86.com sections. If your Russian developer created a way to hack as well then add it in don't be a little sour bitch and delete whole sections because you got a boner for tonymacx86.com. Add your content along with everybody else's content. I thought we were in this together, as all of the development work is shared and credited to each person. So don't be a little bitch and make the page great for resources not a pissing match.

the wikipedia page should be for historical facts- not a pissing match!!!!


 * I recommend that you catch up on WP:NOT, it will explain why those links are not included. Ethelred Cyning (talk) 13:13, 31 December 2011 (UTC)