Talk:Hadith of Ibn al-Zubayr and Mut'ah

citing sources
in the light of WP:CITE, we note the direct resource from which quotes have been obtained. the article gives the impression that all of the citations have been independently verified, although the reality appears to be that this article is a rehash of material found on a partisan website. the prose is also unencyclopedic, and distinctly pushes a particular perspective. ITAQALLAH  23:20, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

must be fixed
This is so biased as to be hilarious. No part of it belongs in the Wikipedia. I would just remove the whole thing - all the text and even the topic. The issue discussed is not of interest to anyone except Shia's deep into anti-Sunni polemic. AT best it should be covered by a single paragraph in whatever article concerns the ways in which Shia marriage customs deviate from the Sunni norm.

I observe my own bias. I think Shia notions should not be presented as at a par with the Sunni norm.DKleinecke (talk) 04:08, 21 July 2009 (UTC)