Talk:Hadlyme Ferry Historic District

significance
The NRIS database, via the Elkman interface, states the significance of the HD is architectural: Historic function: transportation; domestic Historic subfunction: water-related; secondary structure; single dwelling Building is listed for architectural criteria

An editor has twice removed my statement in the article that the significance is architectural (once removing altogether with suggestion of doubt of my accuracy, once asserting dual importance of transportation and architecture). I reverted twice, because the source I have access to is clear that the significance is architectural. Please discuss here. doncram (talk) 04:41, 28 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Another interface, the one I believe I cited, is NRHP.COM, where I believe I had picked up on the "Historic significance" being "Architecture/Engineering, Event". The NRHP.COM listing is:

Historic Significance: 	Architecture/Engineering, Event Architectural Style: 	Federal, Colonial Area of Significance: 	Transportation, Architecture Period of Significance: 	1750-1799, 1800-1824, 1825-1849, 1850-1874, 1875-1899, 1900-1924, 1925-1949 Owner: 	Private, State Historic Function: 	Domestic, Transportation Historic Sub-function: 	Secondary Structure, Single Dwelling, Water-Related Current Function: 	Domestic, Transportation Current Sub-function: 	Secondary Structure, Single Dwelling, Water-Related
 * doncram (talk) 04:46, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Hmmm...I think I would have interpreted "Area of Significance: Transportation, Architecture" as supporting dual importance of transportation and architecture. You think that only what's under Historic Significance should be included? Lvklock (talk) 04:54, 28 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Oh, okay, if someone else wants to make an according change to the article go ahead. doncram (talk) 05:15, 28 August 2009 (UTC)