Talk:Hail to the Thief/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk · contribs) 04:16, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found.

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 04:18, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Review will be posted here within 48 hours. Jezhotwells (talk) 04:18, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Prose good, complies sufficiently with MoS. I made one minor copy-edit.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Sources appear to be RS, spotchecks show statements supported by sources, no evidence of OR
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Good coverage without unnecessary trivia.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * NPOV
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * Article is stable
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Captioned and with suitable fair use rationales. You could include a fair use sample of a song or two, but not GA criteria.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * OK, this is all in order, happy to list this as a GA. Jezhotwells (talk) 23:40, 6 July 2012 (UTC)