Talk:Hair restoration

Spam?
I've noticed a trend in wikipedia's coverage of hair transplantation. They all seem overly eager to advocate Follicular Unit Transplantation, and read far too much like advertisements for those providing this service. It looks like many of them may have been written by a single individual promoting the procedure. While this one of the standard methods of transplantation, wikipedia's coverage should not be so narrow or biased as to direct individuals with glowing reviews rather than organized, cited information. Cleanup requested. --70.227.157.118 04:27, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Hair_transplantation vs Hair_restoration
This page (restoration) is exclusively about transplantation. Shouldn't 'restoration' include other topics besides just transplantation? This page also pales in comparison to Hair_transplantation as far as depth of information, although the citations are just as weak.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.183.233.46 (talk) 04:43, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

Merger
Redundant article. This should be merged with management of baldness. 2600:1012:B11F:7C91:C4E6:1C4E:37CC:1F90 (talk) 22:43, 10 September 2014 (UTC)