Talk:Hajduk

Untitled
I removed these hajduks added by User:151.205.9.162, since they fail the google test. bogdan | Talk 16:55, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Milan Mileusnic (living legend)
 * Damir Arnautovic (living legend)
 * Vlado Brnecic (living legend)
 * Rajko Pupavac (living legend)
 * Vlado Magas (living legend)
 * Germano Nefat (living legend)
 * Damir Susanj (living legend)
 * Edo Demark (living legend)
 * Petar Popic (living legend)
 * Damir Matesevac (living legend)

Avram Iancu
How does he qualify as a haiduk? he was one of the leaders of an organised, national resistance movement with clear aims. He was a lawyer for God's sake! You might as easily say that George Washington was a haiduk since he too was a well educated commander of irregular troops, fighting against what he perceived were national opressors. Avram Iancu clearly does not qualify as a haiduk, i have heard this term describing only local guerrilas/bandits with a limited goal. Not a revolutionary leader! And also... I believe this article should not be linked to the WikiProjectSerbia since haiducs are part of the national myth of several other European countries. Serbia doesn't have a copyright on them. 89.35.62.12 (talk) 02:34, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hajduk. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130801031709/http://www.rastko.org.rs/istorija/xix/apetrovic-banditry_eng.html to http://www.rastko.org.rs/istorija/xix/apetrovic-banditry_eng.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160322072135/http://www.rastko.org.rs/knjizevnost/usmena/bsuvajdzic-uskoci.html to http://www.rastko.org.rs/knjizevnost/usmena/bsuvajdzic-uskoci.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 01:58, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hajduk. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060621010338/http://www.metaweb.com/wiki/wiki.phtml?title=Stephenson:Neal:Quicksilver:391:Haiduks_(Professorbikeybike) to http://www.metaweb.com/wiki/wiki.phtml?title=Stephenson:Neal:Quicksilver:391:Haiduks_(Professorbikeybike)

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 15:39, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Error in spelling
Hello,

Rewrite Hajduk to Haiduk.

https://www.dictionary.com/browse/haiduk

Thank you Marino 08:03, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

Hello, my name is Losangelessloth and I also am here to propose and promote changing the erroneous spelling of the title of this Wikipedia Entry.

Specifically, from Hajduk to Haiduk.

I have here five (5) sources which all contain a singular, uniform spelling of this word. All five (5) sources choose to spell the title of this Wikipedia entry as: haiduk.

[1] There is the spelling from Dictionary.com already sourced by Marino around a year ago. .

[2] Secondly, there is the spelling from Merriam-Webster.com (apparently a company/publisher since 1823).

[3] Thirdly, Britannica.com agrees with the previous two sources' spelling.

[4] Fourthly, I have a less renowned source which most likely obtains their content from more well established publishers, but, nevertheless, still displays the consistency/uniformity apparent across all other sources. The reference is from: Collins.com.

[5] Lastly, a similar source (in terms of lack of prestige) to [4] is thefreedictionary.com -- which follows the same characteristic pattern of spelling the word in question as: Haiduk.

Would anyone wish to discuss what more is necessary to push a change in the title of the Wikipedia entry?

I feel as though this collection of references should be quite sufficient, no?

If not, what more is required so that such a change can be made un-contested?

Is it possible to change the title myself? I < 3 you.

Losangelessloth (talk) 08:18, 14 May 2021 (UTC)