Talk:Hallelujah (Paramore song)

Fair use rationale for Image:Hallelujah Paramore.JPG
Image:Hallelujah Paramore.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 08:00, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Should Hallelujah be considered a power ballad?
I was just thinking is "Hallelujah" a power ballad?! I mean it is more mellow than some of their other tracks and it's very much a "whole lighters in the air while swaying over and back" type of song!--Seán Travers (talk) 14:10, 30 May 2008 (UTC)Seán Travers

1. there are softer ones

2. its more of a worship song than a power ballad and then again its not one of the really open worship songs

3. Its not a ballad it is powerful though

signed, loveyourfaith —Preceding unsigned comment added by Loveyourfaith (talk • contribs) 09:29, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Contradiction in date
Isn't it impossible for the song to be released in 2003 when the band formed in 2004? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.49.68.35 (talk) 00:52, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

edit: I undid the changes somebody had done to the article.