Talk:Halloween: Monster Mix

Untitled
To those reading, admin, the one individual who flagged the article themselves, I at least submit the reasoning that this isn't so much vanity as it is an honest attempt at thorough chronology of one group's work and, where as at the present moment, one hasn't had much time to write a detailed description for it yet--and I was under the impression that such articles as these are written by many over a period of many weeks (or months if need-be)--that such will indeed come to pass; that such descriptions, additions, rewrites by those contributing over many weeks, months, will eventually build the article to an acceptable format. . . It's either that, or I've missed the point of wiki completely.

I only state that, given the fact that such an article has only been available for a handful of minutes at best, wouldn't it at least -appear- as though one is jumping the gun? Unless I'm missing a critical rule? :)

A'course, as the original creator of the article, I wouldn't stand in the way of it's deletion if the admin chooses such a path, though from my point of view, it would then render the path of chronology broken. I must admit that I've only contributed to a handful of projects, and therefore am green to the way wiki takes about dealing with such cases as this; and this is why I wrote this response.

Thank you. :)