Talk:Hamilton Spectator (Australia)

Reliable sources
The Hamilton Spectator did not have a Wikipedia entry and as such required one to provide useful information relevant to the newspaper based in Hamilton (Vic) Australia.
 * While the newspaper meets the notability criteria of Wikipedia, you must remember that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and so should only include encyclopedic information which is validated by proper sources- it is not a place for promotion. Clovis Sangrail (talk) 05:24, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

I'm sorry I totally don't understand the true meaning of Wikipedia... So in essence I could just sign up as an account with a username for myself and not the business, add all the stuff I believe is relevant (ie: similar to NY times etc etc) and there would be no problems? It's more about accurate information and I felt that by having an account based purely as a business login, this would happen better. Just to ask the question... Would I be better to sign up as a new username and just make edits that way?? There is a lot of information that should be displayed that has either been removed or taken off? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hamspec (talk • contribs) 21:05, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The main issue is third part reliable sources. Your own say so as somebody involved is a poor source. The last thing we want is self-promotion--Grahame (talk) 23:52, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hamilton Spectator (Australia). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141215053922/http://www.slv.vic.gov.au/node/6104 to http://www.slv.vic.gov.au/node/6104

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 16:55, 28 October 2017 (UTC)