Talk:Hammock camping/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk · contribs) 02:23, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: one found and fixed. Jezhotwells (talk) 02:26, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 02:27, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * The lead fails to summarise the article.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * There are two references, one with an apparently invalid ISBN, the other apparently published by a hammock manufacturer.
 * Only two paragraphs are referenced. The majority of statements are completely uncited
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * Appears to be a POV article.
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * This is a quick-fail due primarily to lack of referencing, non-neutral point of view. Please read and comprehend the good article criteria before renominating. Jezhotwells (talk) 02:40, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * This is a quick-fail due primarily to lack of referencing, non-neutral point of view. Please read and comprehend the good article criteria before renominating. Jezhotwells (talk) 02:40, 9 November 2011 (UTC)