Talk:Hannah Pearl Davis

‘misogynistic’ is an opinion
Wikipedia articles should always be written from a neutral point-of-view. Articles are improved with facts that can be verified, not rumors or opinions. This article states, “She gained widespread attention in 2023 for her misogynistic commentary.” Stating that she is ‘misogynistic’ is an opinion and shouldn’t be in the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.184.68.90 (talk) 05:00, 5 November 2023 (UTC)


 * The other IP's removal of this statement was correct as per WP:GRAPEVINE. Sourcing will have to be better than the Evening Standard since it has no consensus for reliability. SmolBrane (talk) 18:55, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Forgot to mention--the material used to be cited to say her opinions were 'controversial', maybe this would be acceptable but it doesn't really tell the reader much. SmolBrane (talk) 19:00, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

Defending hebephilia
She posted a tweet about 16 year old teen girls and that should be added somewhere in the article 2600:8801:FB13:6B00:58CD:3953:9E5E:304D (talk) 00:30, 19 January 2024 (UTC)


 * She did write in a tweet "16 year old chicks are hotter than 26 year olds". People saw it as "advocating for dating underage women" but she said it was meant to say "most people are better looking when they're younger" because "by numbers alone most people are overweight or obese by 26". She deleted the tweet later. Her views on looks or how she expresses it is debatable but does not seem to be defending hebephilia. 212.96.35.197 (talk) 10:06, 20 March 2024 (UTC)