Talk:Hansa-Brandenburg W.29/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Zawed (talk · contribs) 03:53, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

I will review this one, comments to follow in due course. Zawed (talk) 03:53, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Comments as follows:

Background and description
 * The fuselage retained its depth after of the rear cockpit...: should that be "aft of the rear..."

Operational history
 * link Zeebrugge
 * destroy naval mines by gunfire after the war that included 25 unarmed W.29s.: if they were unarmed how could they destroy the mines by gunfire?
 * The Hungarian Soviet Republic ordered production of the W.29 at UFAG to restart.: something missing here, maybe "restart [or rebuild] its air force?"
 * Even though it is briefly touched upon in the operators section, it seems like the World War 1 section needs a mention of when the production examples first started reaching service with the Naval Air Service.
 * Deliveries began in April, I don't know when they began to be delivered to combat units--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:31, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

References
 * Which Owers ref is cite 11?
 * Cite 18 doesn't need the year as a disambig, there is only one Mikesh & Abe listed in the bibliography

Other stuff That's all for now. Zawed (talk) 10:16, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
 * The Năstase ref appears to be a book, shouldn't it be listed in the bibliography?
 * It's a magazine article to which I cannot get access.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:31, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Dupe link: cockpit
 * Image tags OK
 * Thanks for the review; see if my changes are satisfactory--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:32, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Changes look fine, so passing as GA now. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 10:38, 16 April 2023 (UTC)