Talk:Haplogroup E1b1b1 (Y-DNA)

Orphaned references in Haplogroup E1b1b1 (Y-DNA)
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Haplogroup E1b1b1 (Y-DNA)'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "Semino2004": From Y-DNA haplogroups by ethnic groups: Semino et al. (2004). From Haplogroup E1b1b1a (Y-DNA):  

Reference named "Cruciani2004": From Haplogroup DE (Y-DNA):  From Haplogroup E1b1b (Y-DNA):  From Y-DNA haplogroups by ethnic groups: Cruciani et al. (2004), Phylogeographic Analysis of Haplogroup E3b (E-M215) Y Chromosomes Reveals Multiple Migratory Events Within and Out Of Africa, Am J Hum Genet. 2004 May; 74(5): 1014–1022.  From Haplogroup E1b1b1a (Y-DNA): Cruciani et al. (May 2004), "Phylogeographic Analysis of Haplogroup E3b (E-M215) Y Chromosomes Reveals Multiple Migratory Events Within and Out Of Africa", American Journal of Human Genetics 74: 1014–1022, doi:10.1086/386294,, PMC: 1181964 From Berber people: </li> </ul>

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:18, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

This article is a split which basically copies 99% of the E1b1b article. It should be reverted to a redirect.
I just discovered this article, and the way that E1b1b and E1b1b1 have been split into two. This should be reverted. E1b1b1 to be a redirect to E1b1b. Both the professional literature and more casual discussion makes no distinction between E-M215 and E-M35. There is nothing to write about E-M215* except that it has been discovered in less than 5 people. Most material still on the E1b1b article is actually referring to E-M35 and would have to be deleted if there is no reversion, making E1b1b a useless stub article. Splits should never result in stubs. Wikipedia does not demand a separate article for every subject that can be separated!--Andrew Lancaster (talk) 11:20, 13 November 2009 (UTC)