Talk:Haraldskær Woman/GA1

GA Reassessment
This discussion is transcluded from Talk:Haraldskær Woman/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.

This article has been reviewed as part of WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force in an effort to ensure all listed Good articles continue to meet the Good article criteria. In reviewing the article, I have found there are some issues that may need to be addressed, listed below. I will check back in seven days. If these issues are addressed, the article will remain listed as a Good article. Otherwise, it may be delisted (such a decision may be challenged through WP:GAR). If improved after it has been delisted, it may be nominated at WP:GAN. Feel free to drop a message on my talk page if you have any questions, and many thanks for all the hard work that has gone into this article thus far.
 * "The Jómsvíkinga saga tells that Queen Gunhild was murdered and then drowned in a bog". If she'd been murdered how could she then be drowned?


 * The Mistaken identity section is completely without citations. Where did this information come from? Similarly, the last half of Details of Haraldskær Woman and Bog chemistry.


 * When books or journals are used as sources the specific page numbers need to be shown.

--Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 18:39, 14 August 2008 (UTC)


 * I've rewritten the Mistaken identity and Details of Haraldskær Woman sections; and added references. Cactus Writer 14:22, 15 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks for dealing with this so promptly. There are still some parts uncited, but I don't believe the information in them is particularly contentious. A couple of books used as sources still don't have page numbers given, but overall I'm happy that enough has been done for this article to maintain its GA listing. --Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 15:02, 15 August 2008 (UTC)