Talk:Hardanger Line/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: S Masters (talk) 10:19, 24 April 2010 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * Article is well written and complies to WP:MOS.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * All references are in order.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Article is broad in its coverage and remains focused.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * Article complies to WP:NPOV.
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * Article is stable.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * All images comply to fair use requirements and are properly captioned.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Comments: There were some minor issues, which I have fixed. I am satisfied that the article complies with all the requirements for a Good Article, and I am happy to pass it. -- S Masters (talk) 11:07, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you for taking the time and effort to review the article. Arsenikk (talk)  11:16, 24 April 2010 (UTC)