Talk:Hardstone carving

Flintstones?
Why would the article include a link to the Flintstones? I've removed it, but seems there is some reverting going on. Please explain. Vsmith (talk) 01:04, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
 * It has been there since the article was written a few years ago, and is partly a joke, but also making a serious point. You were the last to revert, so you can explain yourself! Meanwhile I am reverting you. Anyone else who objects to the reference, please say so here before changing it again. Johnbod (talk) 03:43, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Hmm.. been there since day one. How is that a reason to keep "a joke" (even partly so?) in an article? As you added that unsourced "joke" bit perhaps you can add it back with a WP:RS. Vsmith (talk) 14:17, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Good, I am glad that it has been removed. It did not belong there. Sarcasm is hard to sell without vocal tone. --Bejnar (talk) 18:56, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
 * It was never sarcasm - see a dictionary. Johnbod (talk) 01:14, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Inlay is not hardstone carving
The Mezo-American section should deal more with pectorials and carved masks and not the inlay. Inlay is not hardstone carving. --Bejnar (talk) 18:50, 10 June 2014 (UTC)