Talk:Harjit Sajjan

Military Service
Useful article for info http://www.nationalobserver.com/2015/11/04/opinion/you-have-no-idea-how-badass-trudeaus-defence-minister-really Legacypac (talk) 07:59, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

RfC regarding the capitalization style for "False Claims Regarding Military Role"
Shouldn't the section be titled "False claims regarding military role" instead, as per my previous edit and the MOS entry on section headings? 99.228.147.27 (talk) 08:40, 28 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Yes, obviously - we don't need an rfc to settle this as the MOS makes it clear that only the first letter is capitalized. Isn't that section title a bit POV though? Fyddlestix (talk) 13:52, 28 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Sorry, I'm not very familiar with Wikipedia editing, and didn't want to step on anyone's shoes. I'm not quite sure what you mean by POV- point of view as in a bit biased? If so, I can see where you're coming with that. Perhaps rephrasing to use controversy (along with another word or two) would make it less verbose and succinct. 99.228.147.27 (talk) 08:55, 29 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The MoS uses sentence case in headings. – Sb 2001  01:33, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

im really confused with wikipedia if someone could help — Preceding unsigned comment added by Havy143 (talk • contribs) 20:42, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Dead link
Ref no. 4 of the present version contains dead link, which I am unable to find at Internet Archive. But I guess this link can be used to replace the dead link. As I am not fully sure regarding the similarity of these two links, I am leaving it to others. - NitinMlk (talk) 20:55, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Former Military titles with "the honourable"
The issue of whether former military titles should be included in the top of the infobox is being discussed at Talk:Erin O'Toole. That may also affect this page.--Darryl Kerrigan (talk) 17:15, 21 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Ranks should not be included as honorifics for retired members. It is improper as they are not entitled to display the full rank without indicating they are retired per QR&O, Article 15.09 (available here). Rank is also displayed in the military service section of the infobox with appropriate dates of service, and does not need to be duplicated. Thanks, WildComet (talk) 23:39, 4 February 2021 (UTC)