Talk:Harkenbäk

Speedy Deletion
There is simply no information pertaining to the creek.

Also, a creek in germany is in no way significant/encyclopedic.(comments by )


 * It is true that we do not automatically include all creeks, we do include whatever ones do have substantial coverage. In this case the fairly long article in the German WP provides material for expansion, and several good sources. I am very reluctant to delete any article herewith a corresponding unchallenged article in the deWP, for their standard of notability is in general considerably higher than ours, and applied more consistently. (And, of course, we cover all the world equally. The English in enWP just means that it is written in English.)  DGG ( talk ) 19:39, 1 February 2016 (UTC)